Volume 2, Issue 3 (Winter 2013)                   J. Aqua. Eco 2013, 2(3): 68-57 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Razaghi M, Shokri M R, Savari A, Pazooki J. Ecological risk assessment using heavy metals from surface sediments of Nayband Bay and Asaluyeh region (Northern Persian Gulf). J. Aqua. Eco 2013; 2 (3) :68-57
URL: http://jae.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-110-en.html
Abstract:   (7927 Views)
The toxicity of heavy metals in sediments of the Nayband Bay and Asaluyeh region and potential ecological risk to sediment organisms assessed. Three stations with different degrees of vulnerability of South Pars Oil and Gas Activities (1: Control - 2: medium affected and 3: severely affected) were selected in the study area. Sediment sampling at each station in both cold and hot seasons (2010) were done by Van veen grab. Heavy metal concentration in sediment samples were investigated after the process of digestion and measured by atomic absorbtion. In order to assess the Sediment quality and ecological risk assessment of potential contamination, Contamination Factor (Cf) and Contamination Degree (Cd) were used for heavy metals and sediment, respectively. Finally the risk index was calculated. The highest levels of mercury in stations 3 and Ni, Pb and Zn were measured at Station 1. The maximum amounts of cadmium and copper were observed at station 2. The Most mercury contamination factor value and the least for nickel were obtained at Station 3.The degree of contamination for different stations from the total metal pollution factor was calculated. The maximum contamination level for Station 3 with the amount of 4.51 was obtained. Results showed that, mercury concentrations in the Nayband Bay and Asaluyeh region is upper-middle. Potential ecological risk (Eri), in the case of all metals except mercury, were in low ecological risk. Potential ecological risk of mercury was in very high ecological risk. The three stations were in the most severe ecological risks.
Full-Text [PDF 1439 kb]   (2819 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Published: 2015/01/28

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Aquatic Ecology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)